Tuesday, February 07, 2006

qubits

As I'm wandering around on Edge and thinking about the sagging old maid with the tumor, I'm beginning to think I ought to learn something about quantum computation. (Have a look at www.qubit.org for definitions and info on quantum computing.) What interests me is that it can be used in simulating quantum-mechanical systems. Maybe that means there will be less uncertainty about how we work. Or maybe it won't be relevant for anything as big as a person.

The University of Utah runs a yearly symposium on science and literature that may interest readers here. They describe their project so:

The foundational idea behind the symposium is that there is an important reciprocal influence between the sciences, the arts, and the humanities, though the ways in which current ideas are expressed and manifested, especially in our age of specialization, may be so different that the connections between them—as well as the ability to trace precedence—may not always be clear. Historically, for example, it is almost impossible for anyone who has even a basic understanding of Einstein to read much of Virginia Woolf's work without considering the impact of his ideas on her thinking, while chaos theory may have been predicted in the works of various 19th century writer.

I'm thinking it's time for the old maid to get a name. Let's call her...Roberta Rae. But I think everyone calls her Bobbie.

1 comment:

Amy Charles said...

Digory, do you have recommendations for chaos primers, either general-population or educated-layman?

You can retrodict for quite a long way back, but eventually the resolution of the initial conditions is not enough to specify the pattern at that earlier time

and I take it there's no particular type or category of info that's missing & would make it possible to see how the watch runs all the way back?

I like the soup metaphor, but if we're talking about a nonstop condition, is there a point in your own life where that degree of accident and uncertainty might make you nuts? Apologies to readers who use those words in very specific ways; please feel free to define them more rigorously so us non-scientists can be careful about their use.